Tuesday, December 12, 2006

FEEBACK

4 Comments:

Blogger Pip said...

Feeback yeh..lol! I like the way u've shaped ur arguement..it flows and ur points are developed.

POI

Art house is just another part of 'high culture' appealing to m/c only. Its not appealing to everyone.

Pip x
C SQUADD!!

2:12 PM  
Blogger Charlies Angels-Full Throttle said...

you have got a lot of information on ur blog and have points for both arguments- art house being worthwhile whereas hollywoood being repetitive.

Questions:
Art house may have different conventions to each other but hollywood is much more popular amonst the audience. so why are people more interested in repetitive conventions that new and unique?

Most successful art house films feature hollywood stars moulin rouge (nicole kidman)and kill bill (uma thurman). does that mean audiences are looking for familiar faces for the film to gain their attention?

10:16 AM  
Blogger Jaskeerat said...

woop! nice debate here, probably the one i am most confident with

POI

Repetitive narrative sells, like Harry Potter and James Bond

'artistic recognition' isnt that just an excuse for the low budget?
(oops hope G-Unit dnt think of that or else i'm screwed, lol)

Jaskeerat xx

10:46 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

lol! seems like i can't read where to put things

POI

arthouse films have also used adaptations and sequels eg City of God and The Three Colours trilogy

arthouse can also been seen as a genre, consistently has a complex narrative and a protagonist who rarely expresses their feeling through dialogue. therefore, its films are not any different from genre.

piwowarow!

12:16 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home